Don’t Worry, Dotcom! No Need to Move Over – Not Just Yet, Anyway!
![]() |
Original Image: Ingemar Johansson v. Floyd Pattersson 1959 Wikipedia: Public Domain Photo ________________ |
“Only those who will risk going too far can
possibly find out how far one can go.”
– T. S. Eliot
_________________
Okay, it’s time to weigh in once again on the new gTLDs (pro)
and gTLDs (con), and the preliminary numbers aren’t pretty. As of today, just a
smidge over 1,000,000 new G’s have been registered for the 200 + released thus
far, and some of those are a result of padding (also known as papering the house, as defined by veteran
domainer Ron Jackson of DNJournal.com),
via registrations “gifted” to often unknowing .com registrants. (See also Domain Incite.)
I’m not going
into this ethical lapse here, because in the long run, I don’t think it will
matter in terms of overall success or failure, although it always matters when
a business or individual sets out to deceive potential customers into buying a questionable
product.
If you are not
already familiar with the controversy, just motor on over to Domaining.com and Namebee.com, both domain news aggregators, and find the relevant posts
between June 1, 2014, to about June 8, 2014. You can also find some posts that offer registration
statistics and rankings for the individual gTLDs.
For now, my own proclamation
is as follows:
“The new gTLDs are epic fails, at least for
the foreseeable future.”
The last part of
my statement is important to note because I do believe that there is a future
for them. I predict that acceptance by the mainstream will occur once large
brands start using and advertising their .brands (.Verizon, .Canon, etc.).
However, history
has shown that Big Business is slow to respond to new trends. I remember the
slow acceptance of the internet itself and even .com. One only has to look at some
print newspapers and magazines and their failure to set up a web presence until
it was almost too late – in some cases, it was
too late, with some publications folding altogether.
So given my age,
investing in hundreds of these new G’s would be foolish.
My March 5, 2014,
post – Move Over, Dotcom, Here Comes the New .Whatever! The On-going gTLD “Debate”! And Let’s Go Viral! – was cautiously optimistic. I had
decided to invest in a few, either for resale or defensive purposes.
But my buying has
now pretty much come to a screeching halt. I may register a few .web domains, but, then again, I may not.
Still, given my original
cautious support, I would be remiss if I didn’t fess up and reveal my own
registrations, some of them speculative, some of them defensive, some for personal
use.
Of the 34 total
domains, you will see some two and three word domains – in hindsight, I would
not register these, at least at this time. I recommend sticking with one-word
gTLDs that actually fit the extension.
In other words,
Pizza.shoes would appear to be odd, while Red.shoes makes sense. Finding
keywords that fit the extension was certainly my goal.
Personal Use (2):
Aunt.Sexy (I also have AuntSexy.com)
DearAunt.Sexy (I also
have DearAuntSexy.com)
Defensive: (6)
J.Domains
Jen.Email
Jennifer.Domains
JenniferInternational.Domains
(Total crap, but there you have it.)
Jennifer.International
Jennifer.Wiki
Investment Domains (26):
Champagne.Diamonds
Ask.Email
Just.Email
AllReal.Estate
Cyber.Estate
Front.Estate
FrontReal.Estate
IAmreal.Estate
ImReal.Estate
J.Estate
Large.Estate
TopReal.Estate (also
picked up TopRealEstate.org)
Z.Estate
Dear.Land
FAQ.Land
Front.Land
Ganja.Land
Jazz.Land
Rich.Land
Sioux.Land
Tag.Land
Tap.Land
Dear.Sexy
HeyYou.Sexy
Open.Technology
Our.Technology
So there you have
it, my little adventure in new gTLD land.
If you have any
interest in my investment gTLDs, shoot me an offer by emailing at
Info
[at] JenMail [dot] com
Please don’t
bother if you are not willing to include a fair price.
Also, if you are
new to domaining, please stay away from such investments; get to know this
field first. But worry not: if you want one of my gTLDs and have the cash, I
won’t be checking out your domaining bonafides before selling to you.
Just sayin’.
Thank you.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated by admin.
Due to high volume of spam, only Google account holders will be allowed to post.